Poverty Law Publications - Legal Services

Building Bridges: Improving Legal Services for Aboriginal Peoples

Author: 
Ardith Walkem
Location: 
British Columbia
Date of Publication: 
October, 2007

A 2007 report for the Legal Services Society (legal aid) in British Columbia highlights some of the issues that Aboriginal communities have to deal with when attempting to access justice.

Addressing the unmet legal needs of Aboriginal people requires acknowledging that solutions must be found within Aboriginal cultures and delivered in partnership with Aboriginal communities. There are four key areas where changes could be made by the Legal Services Society (LSS) to significantly improve Aboriginal peoples’ access to, and use of, the legal services LSS provides: (1) Aboriginal representation within LSS, (2) legal representation available to Aboriginal people, (3) communication and outreach to Aboriginal communities, and (4) involvement of Aboriginal people in LSS program planning.

Delivering Poverty Law Services: Lessons from BC and Abroad

Author: 
Andrea Long and Anne Beveridge
Location: 
Social Planning And Research Council, British Columbia
Date of Publication: 
2004

In August, 2002 all BC Legal Services Society’s poverty law direct service delivery primarily funded by the provincial government, were eliminated because of government cutbacks. This research paper reports on the status of poverty law services in British Columbia and records the views of poverty law service providers. The paper researches other delivery models in Canada and in other countries. The report serves as a first step in determining the most pressing poverty law needs in B.C. since the cutbacks and possible options to address them.

The Critical Characteristics of Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario

Author: 
Lenny Abramowicz
Location: 
Ontario
Date of Publication: 
Fall, 2004
Where to find it: 
Journal of Law and Social Policy, vol. 19, p 70.

This article examines the community clinic system in Ontario, particularly focusing on the reasons for its success. The article points out that there are three fundamental characteristics of community clinics that provide poverty law services: local independence and governance by a community elected board of directors, providing services in the area of poverty law, as well as a broad array of services, including casework, public legal education, community organizing, law reform and test cases.

Law, Representation, and Political Activism: Community-based Practise and the Mobilization of Legal Resources

Author: 
Bryon Sheldrick
Location: 
Ontario
Date of Publication: 
Fall, 1995
Where to find it: 
Canadian Journal Law and Society Vol. 10#2

This paper discusses the fact that the relationship between law and political activism have unrealistically drawn a line between legislative and judicial institutional structures. This has failed to consider the structure of professional organizations and the impediments to political activisms created by the nature of legal expertise. It posits that community legal aid clinics are an example of the possibilities of integrating law and political activism.

The paper concludes by suggesting that the success of community legal clinics in sustaining legal activism and political activism over time shows that prevailing conceptions of legal professionalism can be challenged, and that democratic institutional and organizational structures are important mechanisms for democratizing expertise and developing an understanding of law not severed from its social and political context.

Community Legal Clinics in Ontario

Author: 
Mary Jane Mossman
Location: 
Ontario
Date of Publication: 
1983
Where to find it: 
Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Vol. 3

The paper deals with the forces that led to the establishment of the community clinics, their relationships to the judicare system and the purposes behind the government’s assumption of responsibility for funding and defining clinics. It highlights the scope of the service, community involvement, and funding decisions that must be structured very carefully in order to enhance clinics’ abilities to engage in meaningful representation with the establishment of government funded community clinics.

Recommendations include:

  • Workload of the judicare model not be transferred to clinics
  • Not defunding clinics on the basis that the priorities of majority must prevail
  • Maintaining independence of clinics
  • Community involvement needs to be recognized as it’s the most vital element in the unique characteristics of Ontario clinics
  • Individual clinics must define more systemically the scope of services they want to provide
  • Clinics must define the limits of the service mandate set out in the R egulation
  • The service mandate of clinics requires an appreciation of their role in the context of Legal Aid Plan’s judicare program
  • Clinics must be confident that their community organizations are scrupulously independent of other community groups